Skip to main content

About Anecdotes

Welcome to My Inhouse Lawyer’s Anecdote series. These are tales from the front line. Things our team has come across, in the practice of law, which we are sure business leaders will want to know. The purpose is really about highlighting practical gems which you wouldn’t get from AI or a web search.

Note that our Anecdotes aren’t case studies. Indeed, we don’t refer to clients, don’t share specifics and we edit the story to generalise and anonymise!

Any resemblance with real life people or events is coincidental. As they say in the movies, ‘most of what follows is true’

Recent Posts

30 September 2024

The EU’s new AI ACT

24 September 2024

Contractual risk

9 September 2024

Anecdote on a messy manager exit

Anecdote image of a camera rolling

A messy employment & corporate tale

This Anecdote will be fascinating to any business leader who gives shares in their company to an employee.

In a nutshell, it’s a story about what happens when the employee is removed from the company, highlighting what can go wrong if the termination doesn’t follow proper process. It also shows how courts treat employment rights and shareholder rights separately.

Backstory

A company called Abacus Limited (Abacus), hired a senior manager called Tony Madeup to run its sales team.  As part of Tony’s remuneration package, Abacus offered Tony some shares in the company at the nominal value of £100, which he accepted.

Abacus’s company’s Articles contained an (unusual) provision stating that any employee:

  • Who had acquired shares in the company by virtue of their employment; and
  • Was subsequently removed from the company within five years of the date the Articles were adopted,

would have to sell their shares back to the other shareholders for nominal value (i.e. £100 as opposed to market value).

Unfortunately, as it turned out, Tony wasn’t a very good manager. His management style was abrasive and there had been a number of complaints from staff. After some time, Abacus decided to terminate Tony’s employment.

But Abacus inadvertently didn’t follow proper process and the early stages of the disciplinary process fell short of what was legally expected of the company.

The company also took back Tony’s shares – per the company’s Articles – for the nominal sum of £100.

What happened next?

Tony was not happy and he brought an unfair dismissal claim against Abacus.

At the Employment Tribunal, Tony won. The court found that even though Tony’s conduct towards the staff was not appropriate, and Abacus was perhaps justified in its decision to remove him, the company didn’t follow proper process.

There was then a second Tribunal held so the court could decide on what Tony would be awarded.

Key issues

Tony wanted:

  • £100,000; and
  • his shares back or market value

Abacus brought My Inhouse Lawyer in at this stage and our job was to resist this so far as possible. Specifically to reduce the amount of compensation for unfair dismissal because of Tony’s behaviour.

What we did

Working together seamlessly, me (on the corporate side) and Jonathan Waters (our Employment law Specialist) prepared a strategy. We then countered:

  • That the Tribunal had no power to undo the share transfer and that this was a matter for the High Court. Tony resisted this approach on professional advice.
  • Accepting the decision of the first Tribunal (that the company hadn’t followed due process), the Tribunal should take Tony’s behaviour into account when deciding the amount to award Tony in respect of his claim
Blockquote icon
Following due process is essential

Outcome

At the second hearing, the Tribunal gave short shrift on Tony’s claim over the shares, agreeing with MIL that it had no power whatever over the issue of the shares. If Tony wanted to pursue his claim about the shares, he’d have to take it to the High Court.

The court also took Tony’s behaviour as a manager into account as a major contributing factor when deciding the amount to award him (agreeing with MIL).

Ultimately, Tony achieved:

  • One tenth of what he had claimed as an employee; and
  • No shares

A thoroughly satisfactory result and a happy client

Practical gems

  • Get early advice and follow process carefully. Time spent on getting the basics right in a disciplinary process, even if they seem bureaucratic, is time well spent and far better than incurring management time and expense in fighting an Employment Tribunal claim
  • Employment Tribunals will not generally look at corporate matters, even if those matters arise out of an employment issue. Such matters are for the High Court
  • Even where there is a failure of process, the Employment Tribunal will still consider the complainant’s own behaviour and take this into account when considering a remedy

 

 

Moral of the tale

Moral of this anecdote here is to take extra care when you are exiting an employee who also has shares in your company.

If you’d like some help in this area, please feel free to get in touch

James McLeod My Inhouse Lawyer
Written by James McLeod
Principal at My Inhouse Lawyer

One of our values (Growth) is, in many ways, all about cultivating a growth mindset. We are passionate about learning, improving and evolving. We learn from each other, use the best know-how tools in the market and constantly look for ways to simplify. Lawskool is our way of sharing with you. It isn’t intended to be legal advice, rather to enlighten you to make smart business decisions day to day with the benefit of some of our insight. We hope you enjoy the experience. There are some really good ideas and tips coming from some of the best inhouse lawyers. Easy to read and practical. If there’s something you’d like us to write about or some feedback you wish to share, feel free to drop us a note. Equally, if it’s legal advice you’re after, then just give us a call on 0207 939 3959.

Want to know more ? Book a discovery call

How it works

1

You

It starts with a conversation about you.  What you want and the experience you’re looking for

2

Us

We design something that works for you whether it’s monthly, flex, solo, multi-team or includes legal tech

3

Together

We use Workplans to map out the work to be done and when.  We are responsive and transparent

Like to know more? Book a discovery call

Freedom to choose & change

MONTHLY

A responsive inhouse experience delivered via a rolling monthly engagement that can be scaled up or down by you. Monthly Workplans capture scope, timings and budget for transparency and control

FLEX

A more reactive yet still responsive inhouse experience for legal and compliance needs as they arise.  Our Workplans capture scope, timings and budget putting you in control

PROJECT

For those one-off projects such as M&A or compliance yet delivered the My Inhouse Lawyer way. We agree scope, timings and budget before each piece of work begins

Ready to get started? Book a discovery call

How we can help

Help Boxes Desktop
Help Boxes Mobile

Recent Posts

30 September 2024

The EU’s new AI ACT

24 September 2024

Contractual risk

9 September 2024

Anecdote on a messy manager exit

28 August 2024

What to do when court is unavoidable

15 July 2024

Giving guarantees

3 June 2024

Employment law update

8 May 2024

An introduction to Incoterms

7 May 2024

An introduction to employee ownership

18 April 2024

Wrongful trading and the twilight zone

9 April 2024

Getting your business ready for sale

Like what you see? Book a discovery call