Blockquote icon
We challenge the traditional approach and call for sense in legal negotiations

Introduction

I’ve specialised in private company mergers and acquisitions for 25 years – transactions with values anywhere between £1 and £50m plus. What’s always concerned me is that, regardless of the value of the deal, the legal process typically follows the same formula.

First the Sale & Purchase Agreement

Share Purchase Agreements are invariably drafted by the buyer’s lawyer – and always follow the same approach – heavily weighted in the buyer’s favour and unfair to the seller. When you’re advising the seller and the first draft of the SPA arrives in your inbox, you open it, not expecting anything other than business as usual – a battle ahead to get it into shape and make it fair. When acting for a buyer, you take the same approach. Why? Because everyone else does.

Exit Readiness

Then the Disclosure Letter

After the SPA, you get to the disclosure letter. Same problem. Seller’s lawyer sends the DL to the buyer’s lawyer and discloses everything imaginable in the “deemed disclosure” section at the front. It takes hours of work to negotiate these deemed disclosures down to something fair and reasonable. The specific disclosures in the back end, which is the crucial section and where information that impacts the deal will be found, are usually straightforward and deal with real, not theoretical, issues.

Recent Posts

30 September 2021

Hybrid working – is it a way forward?

16 September 2021

Can you dismiss an employee who refuses to return to the office?

16 September 2021

Can we require employees to get vaccinated?

27 August 2021

How good is your cybersecurity?

27 August 2021

They’re using my brand!

Blockquote icon
We look at the commerce and relationship dynamics first, then use the law as a tool, taking care to keep the big picture in mind 

Why is it like this?

This way of doing things originates out of the City of London and has been adopted everywhere. If the big firms do it, then, surely it must be right?

I’ve always felt uncomfortable about it – endless months of negotiation and marking up drafts burns through a lot of time from everyone involved, including the management team of the businesses involved and there are other hidden costs besides professional fees.

In shipping, finance and international trade there are standardised documents and rules which make the process fair, cost effective and easy to use.

Why not in M&A?

Not long ago I worked on the sale of a technology company to a foreign buyer. The buyer instructed a large English law firm and insisted they produce the SPA in fully negotiated form. They’d had previous experience of the way lawyers did things and thought it was unnecessarily complicated. Their approach was brilliant. There were one or two issues which we resolved quickly and enabled the sale to go through smoothly. Both seller and buyer were protected and neither of them had tried to get an unfair advantage.

A better way?

We take the same approach at My Inhouse Lawyer, re-imagining the way M&A is done. We look at the commerce and relationship dynamics first, then use the law as a tool, taking care to keep the big picture in mind.

Because most business people selling out of a company or, for that matter, buying one first-time around, don’t know anything about the process, we explain to them how deals work, and the benefits to be gained by taking the heat and complexity out of deal documents by making them fair and balanced from the outset.
“Deals” tend to have a bit of a mystical status. If the mystery is removed and key documents start out fair and balanced, material commercial issues will be the predominant focus and can be dealt with without too much pain or delay. The aim should always be to achieve fairness between seller and buyer without compromising their commercial objectives.

There will always be risk in deals. We understand this and adopt a business-friendly, realistic approach designed for the client’s benefit. We just think that SME M&A should be cost effective and less complex for everyone involved.

John Nugent Author Photo

Written by John Nugent
RD for South East and Principal at My Inhouse Lawyer

One of our values (Growth) is, in many ways, all about cultivating a growth mindset. We are passionate about learning, improving and evolving. We learn from each other, use the best know-how tools in the market and constantly look for ways to simplify. Lawskool is our way of sharing with you. It isn’t intended to be legal advice, rather to enlighten you to make smart business decisions day to day with the benefit of some of our insight. We hope you enjoy the experience. There are some really good ideas and tips coming from some of the best inhouse lawyers. Easy to read and practical. If there’s something you’d like us to write about or some feedback you wish to share, feel free to drop us a note. Equally, if it’s legal advice you’re after, then just give us a call on 0207 939 3959.

Need help in this area? BOOK A CALL

How it works

1

You

It starts with a conversation about you.  What you want and the experience you’re looking for

2

Us

We design something that works for you whether it’s monthly, flex, solo, multi-team or includes legal tech

3

Together

We use Workplans to map out the work to be done and when.  We are responsive and transparent

Like to know more? Book a discovery call

Freedom to choose & change

MONTHLY

A responsive inhouse experience delivered via a rolling monthly engagement that can be scaled up or down by you. Monthly Workplans capture scope, timings and budget for transparency and control

FLEX

A more reactive yet still responsive inhouse experience for legal and compliance needs as they arise.  Our Workplans capture scope, timings and budget putting you in control

PROJECT

For those one-off projects such as M&A or compliance yet delivered the My Inhouse Lawyer way. We agree scope, timings and budget before each piece of work begins

Ready to get started? Book a discovery call

How we can help

Help Boxes Desktop
Help Boxes Mobile

Recent Posts

30 September 2021

Hybrid working – is it a way forward?

16 September 2021

Can you dismiss an employee who refuses to return to the office?

16 September 2021

Can we require employees to get vaccinated?

27 August 2021

How good is your cybersecurity?

27 August 2021

They’re using my brand!

12 April 2021

Crib sheet on data breaches – what to do

12 April 2021

Employment law update April 2021

12 April 2021

Design liability under construction contracts – a crib sheet

14 January 2021

GDPR Crib sheet, some golden rules

13 January 2021

Crib sheet on GDPR post Brexit, 10 step procrastinators guide

Like what you see? Book a discovery call